NEWS

葡媒:葡萄牙足协准备为C罗红牌上诉,努力减少球员禁赛场次(葡媒:葡萄牙足协拟就C罗红牌提出申诉,力争缩短其停赛期限)

Clarifying news response

I see we need to respond to a news headline in Chinese about the Portuguese FA appealing a red card for Ronaldo to reduce his suspension. The user hasn't specified if they want more information, a summary, or my opinion. Since it seems to be a current event and my last update was in October 2024, I'll need to be careful here. I should ask for more details or a source link and explain the appeal process generally, including typical outcomes.Exploring suspension rules

I need to list potential suspension lengths based on competition rules, like UEFA or World Cup qualifiers, since Ronaldo's red card could be related to either national team or club. Given that "葡媒:葡萄牙足协" indicates a national context, it may be tied to an event like the European Championship. I'll keep my response general. I should provide bullets explaining how appeals work, including timelines, evidence needed, and potential outcomes like rescinding or reducing matches. Also, I'll note that CAS involvement depends on tournament rules and the impact on future fixtures.Clarifying competition details

I think I should ask the user what competition this is about and when the hearing is scheduled. Do they want a brief statement template or a social media post, like a Weibo update? I can offer to draft a short news brief or push notification without using any special tools. It’s important to acknowledge the headline and explain that I don’t have real-time updates, so I should ask for a link. I’ll guide them on what to watch, mentioning the match report, charge classification, and disciplinary code article numbers—though I need to avoid misquoting. I might also mention some precedents involving Ronaldo, like his 2018 UCL red card for Juventus. I should tread carefully and not make any specific claims.Explaining red card rules

I can provide a brief explanation of the red card rules: if it's a second yellow card, that leads to an automatic one-match suspension. But for a direct red due to violent conduct or a serious foul, it could be two matches or more. If the referee made a mistake regarding identity or error, it can be annulled. I should ask the user if they want me to check the latest sources, but I'm uncertain about browsing permissions. I'll keep my request concise!

想了解这条消息的更多细节吗?我目前没有实时资讯权限,但可以说明通常的上诉路径和可能结果,帮你判断葡足协的胜算与影响。

要点:

compe

  • 上诉机构:视赛事而定(欧足联/国际足联/赛事组委会的纪律委员会)。通常需在裁判报告出具后48–72小时内提交上诉与证据。
  • 关键变量:红牌类型(第二黄/直接红)、裁判报告用语、判罚归类(严重犯规、暴力行为、侮辱性语言、阻止明显得分机会等)、视频证据是否能证明“明显误判”或处罚“过重”。
  • 常见停赛幅度:
    • 第二黄变红:通常自动停赛1场,极少上调。
    • DOGSO(阻止明显得分机会,非暴力):多为1场。
    • 严重犯规/暴力行为:常为2–3场;情节轻微且证据充分时,偶有减为1–2场。
    • 侮辱/手势等非接触类不当行为:多为1–2场,视严重性。
  • 上诉可能结果:维持原判;减轻场次;极少数撤销红牌(需证明明显错判);个别情况下若认定上诉无理还可能加罚。
  • 实务建议:关注纪律机构公告中的指控条款与用词、是否引用视频助理裁判(如有)、是否有对方球员/裁判补充报告;这些直接影响是否能“减场”。

如果你有具体信息(是哪一场、红牌原因、赛事名称、媒体链接/公告原文),发我我可以:

  1. 评估减罚概率和可能区间;2) 用更贴近条文的口径写一段简短通报/社媒稿;3) 列一个时间线与窗口期提醒你何时会有裁决结果。